On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 02:41:22PM -0500, Tarekith wrote:
>
> I've tried a few different methods with the MD now, and I've more or
> less settled on the simplest solution. I keep my drum sounds on the
> same labelled tracks. BD and snare on 1 and 2, tracks 3-5 are more or
> less general percussion sounds (bongos, drums, etc), while 6-8 are for
> more metallic percussion. I use vague names for those two groups of
> sounds to give myself some leeway :) Tracks 9-12 are the same as
> labelled (CH, HH. Ride, Crash), while 13-16 are for two RAM machines,
> or maybe CTRL/Input machines if I feel the need per pattern.
i've been thinking along similar lines, and have reached
this tentative arrangement:
http://syncretism.net/img/MD-new_arrangement.jpg
i think breaking the kit and pattern in half will facilitate
jams a little more, of only because it's a more logical
presentation {to my eyes}: main pattern on the left,
alternate pattern/fills on the right.
there are a few nagging questions - shall i use the same kit
on each side, and just use the right side for fills and
accents, or shall i treat them as two distinct kits? will i
get very much out of the RAM machines with only percussion
sounds going out the main outs? ...and so on. i reckon
i'll have a better feel for what i want once i've done it
for a short while.
even now, looking at it, i wonder if i should use one ctl-8,
one ctl-all, one RAM machine and one input machine {i don't
really use any of those very much, although i think a lot of
good things could be accomplished with a ctl-8 and RAM
machine combo}.
--
yours,
niall.
.. . . . . . . . . .
aleph null. a simple insinuation around silence.
http://syncretism.net
.. .. gpg public key - http://www.aleph-null.net/niall.gpg .. ..Message
Re: [elektron] Machinedrum Management
2006-06-12 by niall munnelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.