I'm trying to figure out the best way to use the MM and MD in tandem. Ideally I'd like to master everything from the MM and compose complete tracks on the MM with MD patterns coordinated with the MM. This is turning out to be difficult in practice though. A couple of options: 1. both in pattern mode, manually trigger patterns on both machines. pros: flexible, improvisational cons: can't really save "songs" this way, cool song mode features unavailable 2. mm in song mode/md in pattern mode, send pattern changes to md pros: can compose and save a "song" this way, song mode features available to MM at least cons: need to maintain 1/1 pattern correspondence between machines, no song mode features on the MD, can't stack multiple MD patterns against a single MM pattern 3. mm in song mode, use midi machine to trigger md patterns pros: machines track in tandem, entire song saveable cons: no md song mode features, correlation between mm patterns and md patterns not clear without digging into the midi data. 4. both machines in song mode pros: song mode features available on both sides, possible in theory to compose entire track side by side on both machines cons: song position pointers don't track, so non-linear editing is out I'm leaning towards running both machines in song mode with looped subsections and improvising by jumping between looped sections on both machines. I'll play both machines somewhat "live" and dump it all to audio and finish it up there. The advantages of song mode just seem too big to ignore. Still, it would be nice to be able to compose and save an entire piece with both machines in tandem somehow. It would help a lot if pattern changes could happen at some sub-pattern quantization level like Ableton. Any thoughts?
Message
md/mm tandem strategies
2007-01-04 by milesegan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.