For those of you who consider that 2.5 milliseconds is esoteric when discussing tempo variation and well outside the range of human perception - here is a direct quote from the well respected John Klett from a published and detailed article from a few years ago called 'Delay in Large Format Digital Music Consoles' "Feel is a very subjective thing. Let's define feel as the "relative placement in time of rhythmic elements". The character of each element will make its placement in time more or less a factor in the overall feel. The Snare drum has a large contribution to overall feel in your average pop mix. The only data we have on this at present is empirical. At one time Roger Nichols (Engineer for Steely Dan, Donald Fagan) is said to have defined the limit of feel perception at around 250 microseconds for key elements. My own experience watching how certain producers place elements in time on digital audio workstations brings me to the conclusion that this perception limit is more like 100 microseconds. In any case, people who are very "feel conscious" will agree that we are looking at timing shifts well under a millisecond as important and affecting feel." Even if you take Roger Nichols' figure of 250 microseconds - the acknowledged SPS-1 random timing variation of 2.18 ms between consecutive steps is over 8 times the perceived human limit of feel. The entire article is here if you like a solid read:- http://www.technicalaudio.com/reading/digitalconsoledelay.html Roger Nichols is a legend in his own right and has a great website of very informative articles published in EQ magazine over many years. http://www.rogernichols.com/index.html Regards as always David www.innerclocksystems.com
Message
[elektron] Re: Elektron's timing "signature"
2007-05-03 by innerclock2004
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.