--- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, Crackpot <shifty@g...> wrote: > In general, creating your own waveforms is not as useful as you > might htink. After all, there is a definite, finite limit > on the # of waveforms your brain can distinguish. What's really > valuable is how you modulate those waveforms. Kind of depends on how you define "waveform"; look at transwave synths like the Wave, ASR-10, Fizmo, etc, and their implementation and definition of a waveform is vastly different than the usual/standard subtractive synth waveforms... Given the direction that those synths as well as many samplers go in, it could be argued that ANY sound or source is (or can be) a waveform in its own right. So even a vocal snippet could be a waveform in theory, and that would have a vastly different sound -- even independently of how you modulated it -- than other waveform types. So really, IMHO, it depends on what kind of waveforms could be used/created... Of course, if it's just standard waveform types, you're probably correct; creative modulation is key. But if the user can use a more abstract set of tools, the rules change...
Message
[elektron] Re: hats, verbs, reverse and other whishes.
2002-12-26 by Mind Mechanic <machanic@eecs.tufts.edu>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.