Re: [elektron] Re: Sidstation sux Redux (haha I rhyme)
2002-02-18 by Michael Tucek
HAHAHHAHARHARHAHRAHAHRHAHAHHRAHRHAHRHRAHRHARHRAHRAARAHHAHAHRHAHRAHRA such a ............. ----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "nuotto" <Nuotto@...> To: <elektron-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 4:02 PM Subject: [elektron] Re: Sidstation sux Redux (haha I rhyme) > --- In elektron-users@y..., "angrysavant" <angrysavant@h...> wrote: > > I didn't want to let this thread die as it was causing so much > > irritation for everyone ;) I would like to upload a 10x sid track > > to the files section. Can someone grant me access please? 10x is > > great but 63x starts to sound like some instruments I've made in > > absynth. I'll try to up a 63x as soon as I have access. > > > > Don't get too excited, a little pressure on elektron to add 3 > > channels + faster register updates is a good thing. > > > > Elektron seems to be open to the idea of this update, but are > focused > > on improving the MD while lots of unsatisfied sidstation owners are > > selling on ebay and harmony-central. I still have my sidstation in > > hopes that they will update the os and I can stop bothering with my > > c64's. The Sidstation could be a classic.... yeeeehaaaa > > > > > > -savant > > Don't know if the faster register rate is even possible to do with > only a OS update (I think the processor controlling the chip is not > fast enough). Still I completely agree, that separate midi channels > for each oscillator is something that should be added to the os. It > would make the Sid Station _much_ more useful. This might require > major re-progamming of the OS, but I think it would be worth it > (especially when I don't have to do it myself :-P ). Now, for me the > Sid Station is a bit of a star-head screwdriver; you don't use it too > often, but when you need it, it's just the tool for the job. ;) > > Mikael > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > >