Waiting until a stable release of the windows version is the way to go. On Nov 8, 2005, at 1:59 PM, esynthesist wrote: > About the issue to port EMAXLib to Linux and Mac: > > I will publish the C-code of the software and also a EMAX I/EMAX II > specification document explaining the complete structure of the disk > images, including the 8-bit compression algorithm. > This however will be done only after the first official version has > been released (version 1.01). > I don't think it would be a good idea to do it now because I'm still > working on it frequently. The code is still incomplete (alpha > version) and ... also a little bit dirty. A lot of comments are > missing, so the code is hard to read at the moment. > I will first clean up the code, add the missing features, and also > make it a more modular so that the functions have a granularity that > can be used by GUIs. > > Both code and specification document will probably be published under > the GNU GPL license. > I don't know when this will happen - I'm taking a break now and I'm > also waiting on more feedback & test results from the community :-). > Probably 1Q2006. > > ///E-Synthesist > > > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, poeml@c... wrote: >> >> Hi E-Synthesist, >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:33:41PM -0000, esynthesist wrote: >>> Yes, it's being programmed in ANSI C (well, I'm not sure about > the >>> ANSI stuff, but hey, who cares :-) >> >> :-) >> >>> So porting to Linux or whatever platform is definitely an option, >>> though I'm using some tricky MS-DOS calls. But these can easily > be >>> replaced by MAX/LINUX system calls or maybe even by C-calls (I'm > a >>> bit lazy in checking all C-libraries :-) >> >> Actually, I'm not worried too much about those calls. >> I once had the intention to port the DOS program EMX (written in C) > to >> Linux, and I found that all those DOS C calls were not needed in > Linux >> because all is managed transparently in the kernel when simply >> reading/writing from/to /dev/fd0u800. In fact, I ended up with a > simple >> 20-lines shell script. >> >>> Porting requires of course the distribution of the source code. > I'm >>> still struggling on that one, you know: stuff like GNU and so on. > I >>> have no problem to publish the source code (in fact I like open >>> source) but the way I should do it is not clear to me yet... I > have >>> to check the possibilities. >> >> If you have specific questions, maybe I can help. :) >> First of all, make sure whether your code includes any foreign code > (for >> example, snippets that you copied from elsewhere) or if it is all > owned >> by you, because obviously you can only give away your own code :) >> >> Have you experience in working with CVS or subversion repositories? > I >> can offer to host the source code, and/or a web site for news and > such. >> >> Peter >> -- >> the pink cardinal imitated the big cardinal >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- > ~--> > Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your > home page > http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/QnLolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ~-> > > Emax and Emax II User's Group Website > > http://www.silveriafamily.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >
Message
Re: [emax] Re: Question to Esynthesist..
2005-11-08 by Alex Pereda
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.