The main different is that EIII has got analogue filters, Emax-2 don't. EIII is a different machine than the EII and Emax-2 is a upgraded version of Emax. ESi-32 is an cheaper version of EIII, like Emax was from EII. cheers/ niklas --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "rob" <rob@...> wrote: > > Hi > Nothing....same sample engine...just the sample libraries are different. Or > and AES and other studio friendly features. > The EIIIX was delayed by 3 years....E-mu Systems were going to build on the > E3 platform with new cards and features, including record to disk. > But all these good ideas were killed off, as E-mu Systems went down market > to get volume and revenue with the Protues. > The E3 nearly killed E-mu...and the Direct to Disk option never worked. > Digidesign solved the porblem in software (interlaced writing as the disk > speed was too slow). > The EIIIX project (2nd or even 3rd attempt) eventually got the go ahead, but > only as a stop gap until the E4 arrived with new DSP chips and new OS. > EIIIX was a double Emax II with different memory chips and the E3 OS, hacked > up as a low cost development. > > regards > rob > www.emulatorarchive.com > > > > > > . > > <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv? s=97359714/grpId=233380/grpspId=1705032144/msgId= > 4749/stime=1226614996/nc1=3848607/nc2=3848641/nc3=5522133> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Emas II and EIIIX comparison
2008-11-14 by Niklas Noren
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.