Yahoo Groups archive

Emax

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:23 UTC

Message

Re: Emas II and EIIIX comparison

2008-11-14 by Niklas Noren

The main different is that EIII has got analogue filters, Emax-2 
don't.
EIII is a different machine than the EII and Emax-2 is a upgraded
version of Emax.

ESi-32 is an cheaper version of EIII, like Emax was from EII.

cheers/
niklas


--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "rob" <rob@...> wrote:
>
> Hi
> Nothing....same sample engine...just the sample libraries are 
different. Or
> and AES and other studio friendly features.
> The EIIIX was delayed by 3 years....E-mu Systems were going to 
build on the
> E3 platform with new cards and features, including record to disk.
> But all these good ideas were killed off, as E-mu Systems went down 
market
> to get volume and revenue with the Protues.
> The E3 nearly killed E-mu...and the Direct to Disk option never 
worked.
> Digidesign solved the porblem in software (interlaced writing as 
the disk
> speed was too slow).
> The EIIIX project (2nd or even 3rd attempt) eventually got the go 
ahead, but
> only as a stop gap until the E4 arrived with new DSP chips and new 
OS.
> EIIIX was a double Emax II with different memory chips and the E3 
OS, hacked
> up as a low cost development.
>  
> regards
> rob
> www.emulatorarchive.com
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> .
>  
> <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?
s=97359714/grpId=233380/grpspId=1705032144/msgId=
> 4749/stime=1226614996/nc1=3848607/nc2=3848641/nc3=5522133> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.