yeah i have no idea what could cause it... i noticed it on a Baldwin i had years ago while running a drum pattern from my ext sequencer but also had sequences running to other gear on separate MIDI channels, including another drum pattern to a Jomox Airbase99, and only noticed the sloppiness with the Baldwin. i did a little reading and the Emulator Archive page confirmed this for Emax and mentioned the main processor being somewhat overloaded. http://www.emulatorarchive.com/Archives/Samplers/EmaxOverview/EmaxTech/emaxtech.html i've also experienced the same issue with my Emax rack i now use. like i said, it's not an issue for simple drum patterns but when you start doing a 16th note pattern on a hi hat for example, it's very easy to hear. anyways there's always a work around in the studio and to me, owning an Emax quite versatile in terms of offering true 8/12 bit samples of those vintage drum machines like the Linn Drum or the DMX so i'm not complaining. :) On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Ted Summers <djtbs1@...> wrote: > Well, your assertion is assuming the MIDI timing is a CPU issue and not one > of a slightly off MIDI clock, or issue with the MIDI clock circuit design. > > Maybe that specific item could be looked into- does everyone have that same > issue with the MIDI- or is something wrong with the MIDI circuit in Brooks > Emax? > > Any comments? > > Regards, > Ted > > > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Brooks Mosher <brooksmosher@... > >wrote: > > > > > > > well what if you like most of what the Emax can do but feel it's limited > in > > a small way? for example, personally, i love the sound, and i can deal > with > > most of it's limitations, but one thing that i do wish was improved upon > is > > the MIDI timing. trying to use it as a sampler for drums w/ an external > > sequencer (as this is how i produce music) is a near impossible thing > when > > you start using more than 3 drum sounds, especially if you are doing more > > than a simple 1-2 1-2 beat - i end up having to solo each drum part's > > pattern and then multi track all of them which is something i prefer to > > avoid since i lose that "live" feel i get otherwise. > > > > so wouldn't a faster cpu fix the MIDI timing problem? but then again, > even > > if it could in theory, wouldn't it be a monumental task and not really > > worth > > it at the end of the day? and i'm sure many people would just tell me to > > get an Akai or use software programs and stop my bitching... ;) > > > > but yeah if the MIDI timing wasn't an issue the Emax would be a perfect > > machine for me. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Ted Summers <djtbs1@...<djtbs1% > 40gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > > > I am just wondering why people keep wanting to change the base > > > underpinnings > > > of the Emax hardware. > > > If you aren't happy with what Emax does do, then maybe you need a > > different > > > piece of equipment or software to do this "other thing" you are looking > > to > > > do? > > > > > > I certainly understand wanting to maximize the possible options of the > > > Emax. > > > Heck if I could increase either the HD size / # of banks or Max sample > > > memory in an Emax 1 that would be great. > > > > > > But to change out the CPU? What is the purpose of that? > > > And the Echip is a special purpose IC. You can't just blindly utilize > it > > in > > > a circuit.... > > > > > > Without the Echip, the Emax is no longer an Emax, it would be something > > > different. > > > So I just don't get some of these comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:21 AM, jammie <jammie.emma@... > <jammie.emma%40blueyonder.co.uk> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > waste of time it would need to much hacking of motherboards to > > impliment > > > > > > > > if you read the thread on the dx group it is for programming of sysex > > > > strings so you change parameters on the fly but it only works on 1 > > > parameter > > > > at a time and would need many more controls and code to impliment > loads > > > of > > > > controls at a time problem with sysex data it can soon overload the > > midi > > > > channel > > > > > > > > he designed it so you colud change a param with out looking at the > > panel > > > > lcd and buttons in real time > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: thenewyorkcowboy > > > > To: emax@yahoogroups.com <emax%40yahoogroups.com> <emax% > > 40yahoogroups.com> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:59 PM > > > > Subject: [emax] Microcontroller > > > > > > > > I just saw this post on the Yamaha DX group and thought I would put > it > > > here > > > > for us to comment on as well. Don't know how it might apply but ideas > > are > > > > welcome. My initial thought is somehow using this to translate the > EMAX > > > > source code into something that we could understand and modify, then > we > > > > could write a new OS that would implement the new features of the > extra > > > > stuff we put in, or possibly if the stars were aligned we could even > > > replace > > > > the dated microprocessor of the EMAX with this one and write brand > new > > > > code... > > > > > > > > Here is the Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmel_AVR > > > > > > > > Re: Editor Librarians for TX81Z > > > > Posted by: "Alan Probandt" alan_probandt at yahoo.com alan_probandt > > > > Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:18 am (PST) > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I have noticed the trend towards over-complication that was mentioned > > in > > > > your message and agree. However instead of resurrecting 1980s 8-bit > > home > > > > computers, I suggest looking into the modern microcontroller scene > that > > > is > > > > always improving in terms of performance for the price. > > > > I have been doing MIDI development with the Atmel AVR microcontroller > a > > > lot > > > > for the past five years or so. I don't have a lot to show for it, > from > > a > > > > professional perspective, but what has been done is in open source > and > > > > available. The AVR is almost a 1980s home computer on a inexpensive > > chip. > > > > There is a 20MHz CPU core running 130+ op-codes, two or three > > > input/output > > > > ports, a serial port UART or two, a cluster of 10 bit analog/digital > > > > convertors, several timers, and a Flash ROM space of 4K bytes to 128K > > > bytes. > > > > Lacking is big on-board RAM, video, and sound generators. Programs > are > > > > written in free assemblers or C compilers and loaded into the flash > > ROM. > > > No > > > > need for ultraviolet erasers any more. All programs are stored in the > > > ROM. > > > > No program code runs from RAM, which makes AVRs different from home > > > > computers. > > > > Video can be done using attached LCD graphics modules that sell for > > about > > > > $20. Sound ICs have disappeared probably for good, but MP3 and MIDI > are > > > > straightforward to implement. Massive data storage is done on small > > cheap > > > SD > > > > Flash cards at a cost of about $10 per gigabyte. > > > > AVRs have the same programming 'feel' that the old home computers do, > > but > > > > they are much more widely available. There isn't any concern that a > > > program > > > > written for DOS or Commodore 64 can't be shared because the hardware > is > > > > unobtainable. > > > > The 10-year-old 8-bit 20MHz $8 AVR is on the verge of being replaced > by > > > the > > > > $4 50MHz 32bit ARM-family of microcontrollers, specifically the > Cortex > > > M3. > > > > This device is made by many companies, but it is much more difficult > to > > > > program and is 'overkill' for MIDI applications. > > > > > > > > Just a brief update on the alternatives to using unprogrammable > desktop > > > PCs > > > > for MIDI applications. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > > > Version: 8.5.431 / Virus Database: 270.14.123/2592 - Release Date: > > > 12/29/09 > > > > 07:47:00 > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Emax and Emax II User's Group Website > > > > > > http://www.silveriafamily.comYahoo < > http://www.silveriafamily.comyahoo/>! > > Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Emax and Emax II User's Group Website > > http://www.silveriafamily.comYahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [emax] Microcontroller
2009-12-30 by Brooks Mosher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.