Eml synthesizers

> yeah, after referencing the schematic and a few phone calls I think
> you're right about the V/Hz oscillators on the 200. thats so annoying.


I think the original EML 100 was v/hz too.  AFAIK, the usual way to
control the 200 was with a 300.  I don't know how well the 200 VCOs
would track v/hz - they're utterly primative - so even an expo converter
might not help.  The sequencer is probably your best bet.

The 100 was updated to the 101 and the 300 was updated to the 301. Does 
anyone know if there was ever a 201?


> I haven't had time to test my 400 with my 101 yet but i think they
> will scale the same. Anyone have a schematic for the 400?

Only a few random pages which don't all join up, and mainly of the 
400 synth section, not the sequencer.  I'd be interested to see a full
set of the 400 schematics and also a decent photo where I can read all 
the labelling.  (I don't have a 400 yet).

What I did find was a page entitled "EML 200 STUDIO SYNTHESISER as the
SOURCE and MODIFIER SECTION for the EML 400 SERIES SEQUENCER".  If my
unreliable medieval parallel port scanner can be persuaded to work one
more time, I'll scan it for you...

Note: I am not an EML expert.  If any of the above is wrong, someone
please say so.


Steve