EML 101 patchbay question
2006-10-31 by jacobcullins
Hello all.. I just picked up an EML 101 and the first thing that grabbed my attention was that the ring modulator is placed after the filter in the signal flow.. I don't know if this is common with most other synthesizers of its era, but to me it seems illogical. By no means am I saying that the decision to do so doesn't provide for some interesting sounds and effects, but to me it would seem more useful placed before the filter for a greater variety of waveforms. This brings me to my question.. Instinctively I thought to just patch the output of the ring modulator into the input of the filter, problem solved. However upon going to do so, I realized there wasn't even an output for the ring modulator. I tried the output for the amplitude shaper section of the modulator thinking that may work, however no processed sound arrives at the filter. The filter input checks out fine and works otherwise. Am I just not seeing something here? Is there a way around this, or is this just an inherent design flaw? Thanks for any help.