EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Hi Pete.I don't see any legal issue in a third party developement of 
periphials.It is not an item that takes the program an mutates it.The third party 
would not exist without the original item(app.)..I think that Co.s can only 
welcome third party developers so that their product becomes not only 
more"mass friendly",but also the name gets around FREE.You can't write a 
book about say OSX without the title.Otherwise no one would know what the 
book was about or for that matter were to look for the book.
>>
>>Here's a sticky one..Say I have a CD and choose to,instead of numbers to 
specify tracks use..A sample from one of the samplers I use on the track to 
denote the song..So the third track would be called c1 and the sample from 
the verse keyboard is played til decay to zero..Say that is done 10 times for 
ten tracks..Were is that in regards to ownership..It's the sample used in the 
track but presented as a track marker..
>>
>>So the question is?Artistic freedom??I am doing an artistic thing in my 
mind.And I am using the sample in the song..So if one is copyright 
infringement then how could it be the other is not..I state them both to be 
liscenced under artistic freedom..Who's to say otherwise..Opens a wonderful 
can of worms..
>>
>> Actually I've been hoping for some time now that an Artist would have 
some patches stuck on the end of their CD or in a computer file as some discs 
have extras.Why not make it more of a total experience for your 
fans.Ecspecially when it comes to electronic music.It would be great to have a 
CD extra from the chemical bros that shows even a Quiktime snippet of them 
working something up..I can't see it breaking the bank with the technology as 
advanced and easy to use..Maybe someone will start..Then things will get 
interesting..Just a dream but I feel it more then valid..What do you think??And 
thanks for the reply.Hope this finds you well and inspired..T