Hi Kokoon, I miss my SH-101 for just that reason. I spent some time thinking about how to do, as you so appropriately put it, "decent portamento". At one point I was looking at using the existing master DCO bend circuit to create the portamento but I fear that might not give us a "decent" portamento and I just know it's going take a lot of programming time to make it work. Another way to do portamento would be to build a brand new master DCO that was able to sweep across the entire 88 note keyboard (did I mention that I'm going to provide full 88 key range as an selectable parameter?). But such a master DCO will require even more circuitry so it will definitely have to go into the full retrofit kit. I may try to use the bend circuit first and see what sort of results I get, if they are "decent" then perhaps we can avoid adding more hardware. Isn't this fun! Mike. --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "jure zitnik" <kokoon@...> wrote: > > all i'm interested in is a decent mono mode with portamento :) > > cheers, > kokoon > > On 4/12/07, korgpolyex800 <korgpolyex800@...> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Well, if there's one thing I've learned it's that you should never use > > polls to make decisions because you can be sure that poll questions > > were written and scripted by an idiot. > > > > OK, down to business. > > > > After looking at the poll results and seeing some of the responses I > > was prompted to rethink the goals of the project. Taking into > > consideration all of the work I've done so far and the progress made > > it would be possible to take all of the new sysex functions (and more) > > and put them into ROM space if we could add just one additional 8K > > ROM. The challenge is to add that ROM without requiring major surgery > > on the hardware. Well it turns out that a small board that would use > > two 8K ROM's and one XOR logic gate chip could be made that would map > > the second ROM into the same address space as the existing RAM. The > > second ROM would be disabled for the low 2K of address space where the > > 2K RAM exists. This would mean that we would end up with 14K or ROM > > instead of the existing 8K. The only problem with this concept is that > > we don't get any additional RAM at all. This would mean that any new > > sysex commands would have to be wedged into the existing RAM in such > > as way as to not stomp all over the existing programming. I'll have to > > do some testing to see what scratch RAM is available in that little 2K > > RAM chip. > > > > Then, there is the big retrofit project. This will give us so much > > additional RAM, ROM and other hardware that we'll be able to transform > > the Poly 800 and EX800 into something much more than we could ever > > have imagined. It requires removing one IC and adding a much larger > > plug in board. It will include two flash EEPROM's which means we'll be > > able to download new code as it becomes available. And it will have > > many new performance parameters and operational capabilities. > > > > I think perhaps I should go for the easier retrofit kit first and go > > from there. > > > > Mike. > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Two different retrofit kit
2007-04-12 by korgpolyex800
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.