Well, I did the mod last night with the 10K pots, and it seems pretty extreme to me. With cutoff all the way right I get only the faintest rumblings of bass. Resonance mostly to the right gives some basic wah wah-type sweeps, but this also puts most of the range of the cutoff knob on the right, meaning after it goes about midway it no longer has an effect. But man, with resonance in the middle, WATCH OUT! R2D2 noises! This is the ear-splitting stuff they warn you about. Now cutoff controls this new pitch, and I can use its full range, left to right. So that's my mod. Does it sound in line with the results everyone else gets? Oh, the other difference I just realized is that I accidentally used linear, rather than log/audio pots. It seems like audio pots would just compound the effect of having the useful range of the knob limited to its upper range. Or not? By the way, is there a term for when it starts generating that new, high frequency tone that you control with the cutoff? Thanks! Tim --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "Byron Deerr IV" <bdeerr@w...> wrote: > I'm fairly sure the mod would be less extreme, I think the 10k pot > would end while turning it beofre it reached the maximum value. I > used a 100k pot, if I remember correctly, and once it reaches a > certain point while turning it just stops changing it. I had no > intentions of improving the mod...it's just what I happened to have > laying around at the time. > > Byron > > -----Original Message----- > From: wunderhorn1 [mailto:wunderhorn1@y...] > Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 11:18 PM > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer with 10K Pots? > > > For those with more electric knowledge than I... what would be the > theorectical effect of doing the moog slayer mod with 10K pots rather > than 50K pots? More extreme? Less extreme? What about with much > larger values, like from guitar controls? (250? 500?) > > Thanks! > > >
Message
Re: Moog Slayer with 10K Pots?
2004-04-10 by wunderhorn1
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.