Kool Musick said: > > Well ... again ... the USA isn't my area of expertise, but my overall > > impression is that being a really good local band isn't quite enough to > > help you -- in general -- to pay all of your bills or sustain a really > > great career, and so eventually, I think, the frustration kicks in and so a > > lot of good bands die an untimely death for lack of that extra little > > whatever-it-might-be that carries them through. Marc Lindahl said: >Actually, these days in the US, really the only way to make it is through >local success. I kind of thought that's what I said. You create a local success, and then if you have that extra something (luck, whatever) you then move on to the national level. >But success in the business sense - not that fans think >you're hot, but that you've done all the label's work for them already - >built a fan base, started your own little label, got radio play, sold your >CD's at gigs and in local record shops (to the tune of 10's of 1000's of >copies...), and put yourself on tour. Yes .... and ....... >Basically, once you've proved that >your band is a viable ongoing business, then you have a chance to get >signed.... Great. So you move from local to national. Now ... here's the question ... what happens to those bands that fail to make this transition from local to national? What I tried to say was that those bands who can't move from local to national then find that after 5 years or so, the expensive reality of paying mortgages and raising children kids kicks in, and for the vast majority of them it's just not possible to keep being a great local band indefinitely, and they slowly fade away ... except for guest appearances at local festivals and the like ... and even those gradually dissipate. Far as I can see we're saying the same thing except that I was focusing on the bands that didn't quite make it while you were focusing on the ones that did!! We both agree, I think, though, that in the USA the major labels don't really expect to take a band from the ground up any more ... they just seem to kind of cash in on the few hot local bands that they think they can market nationally. They make somewhat idiosyncratic decisions based on corporate profits meaning that some really good local bands are left to slowly haemorrhage due to the fact that the punters in every single local market also participate in the national market ... and for most of them when they're stuck with a choice for buying the next CD and there's a local group CD in one hand and a national one in the other and they're short of money, it's the local band's CD that hits the bin first. Keeping yourself going as a local band after a few years is very difficult when you're competing against (a) the bands that made it; and (b) up and coming local bands who've got a buzz that they might be the next big think. After 5 years of being the next possible big thing it's pretty clear that you're not going to be IT and are never going to be and ..... accountancy here I come. Kool Musick Keep Musick Kool _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: British Bands etc
2001-11-01 by Kool Musick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.