> >not theologians, biblical scholars, or Koran scholars. Like amateur > >musicians, they are entitled to their opinions, and I personally don't mind > >them expressing them. > > Why does it take a religious scholar to have a spiritual relationship > with "God" by whatever name? Even common people can love a song and get > an emotional charge from it - without an explanation from a musician. I don't think that was the point, the issue is that for people who want to explain the relationship of the Old and New Testament to modern Christianity and be credible they should have a background in one of the aforementioned fields. He brought this up because there was some supposition about how the NT superseded the Old. Now on a personal level that's totally fine. But if one's making a generalization and relating that to how warfare should be viewed by Christians (at least post-NT ones), then it helps to have some background. But of course he also stated that everyone is certainly entitled to their opinion and even without credentials it doesn't mean they're specifically wrong.
Message
Re: [L-OT] religious scholars
2001-11-03 by Wilson Zorn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.