> >As Logic baby implied above, I'd say that the biggest difference between >analogue and analogue modelling in digital synths is largely due to the 'non >linearities' that creep into the system in the various stages of a real >analogue >synth. Even the best designed circuits will have some limits as to how far >they >can minimise 'problems' like power supply fluctuations, drift in capacitors >and inductors, and the various waveshaping distortions (often unintentionally) >introduced in virtually every transistor in a circuit. As a consequence, >these >'deficiencies' give many anasynths the character and quality of sound that so >many people love(d) about them. Warmth, fatness, grit, etc... I would bet >however, that if they could have, many designers would have willingly chosen >to avoid the distortions and irrgularities if it were possible to do so >when thesynths were designed and built. Many might have but I have read interviews with Bob Moog and it is pretty clear that he wouldn't. I have seen him say that his favorite processor is a clipping transistor. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-06 by Dennis Gunn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.