> From: LogicBaby <basharar@...> > >but the interaction of electronics is > still too perfect to make the instrument more human like, ie more imperfect. I don't think it's perfection as much as lack of understanding of what the analog counterpart is really doing. For example, hard/soft oscillator sync. There are many ways to do this in the analog world, and they yield different (but entirely predictable) results - which is being emulated? Or intentional sources of distortion - are the circuits being understood to that level? Most of the analog designers aren't sharing their secrets... The other thing has to do with instrument design. I mean, in the same way a violin is designed to be an instrument, so is a micromoog or a minimoog (two very different playing experiences, by the way). Something simple such as the range of a knob has a big effect on the palette of sounds. Are the virtual instruments spending time with such considerations?
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-06 by marc lindahl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.