> From: GAmoore@... > > The word 'model' can be used two different ways. In a theoretical sense, > we have digital models of the analog, but things like the Microphone > Modeller and the POD use modeling in a different sense - which is more > like samplying what happens when various signals are fed in and looking > what happens. They even take into account how adjusting the controls > interact with each other on various models of amps. > > But thats not what happens with digital analog synths. The way the POD uses the word modelling is the same way as the synths - modelling the *behaviour* of the analog circuitry (as opposed to modelling the circuitry itself). The mic modeller abuses the term, because what it's really doing is determining a static impulse response of a mic (already a simplifying assumption) and the convolving some arbitrary input with the impulse response (in other words 'running the input through' the impulse response).
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-07 by marc lindahl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.