marc lindahl <marc@...> wrote: >> From: Dennis Gunn <dennisg@...> >> >> Once about 9 years ago on the DAW I remember writing about how the >> digital wave form for a sine wave up around say 19.k looks like a >> broken spiral staircase and how I find it hard to believe that any >> amount of filtering is going to turn that into a clean sine wave. A >> lot of peaple called me ignorant for being decieved by the look of >> data but Nothing I have seen or heard since has ever convinced me I >> was wrong. > >You're not hearing the data - you hear the data after it's been timed and >output through a D/A converter, which includes a reconstruction filter. To >compare apples to apples you need to hook an oscilloscope up to that analog >output and compare the two. You'll see that the digital sinewave looks the >same. > >There have also been studies done showing that different looking waveforms >(due to the relative phase of thier harmonics) sound the same - so don't be >deceived by how a waveform looks. It's useful information, to be sure, like >when editing, but it's not perfectly correlated to the sound. This observation is not relevant to a sine wave as any change in appearance at the *audio* output outside of a strict shift in phase, can only be distortion. S.
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-07 by Spectro
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.