>The polymoog had a custom-made chip per key. Each chip contained >(more or less probably) an entire monophonic synthesizer. That's the >only way they were able to build polyphonic synths at the time. Not quite. The Polymoog used two master oscillators routed through divide-down chips, like electronic organs, string synths, and a few early Korg poly synths. This is why it sounded so thin and crappy. So it did not have a complete mono synth on each key -- but it did have a filter and amp for each key... of course, the filter here is not the famed Moog filter either. It did have the advantage of being 71-note polyphonic though. The Polymoog was a costly failure for Moog. It suffered numerous production delays and was a major disappointment in terms of sound (although Klaus Schulze and Gary Numan were among the few who could put it to good use). The Polymoog was quickly forgotten when real polyphonic synths like the Prophet 5 came along.
Message
Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-07 by Bruce Bartlett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.