Thoughts from the mind of Bruce Bartlett, 07-11-2001:
> >The polymoog had a custom-made chip per key. Each chip contained
> >(more or less probably) an entire monophonic synthesizer. That's the
>>only way they were able to build polyphonic synths at the time.
>
>Not quite. The Polymoog used two master oscillators routed through
>divide-down chips, like electronic organs, string synths, and a few early
>Korg poly synths. This is why it sounded so thin and crappy. So it did not
>have a complete mono synth on each key -- but it did have a filter and amp
>for each key...
That's why I included the "more or less probably", as I was not
entirely sure. Thanks for setting things straight.
cheers,
HJ
--
Hendrik Jan Veenstra
email: mailto:h@...
www: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.htmlMessage
Re: Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-08 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.