>> > Mathematicians are very much artists. > >Some mathematicians, yes. Most are however just plain dull 9-5 >office workers. Oh come on! Just because you can't see the fruits of their labor, doesn't mean it isn't beautiful. Wasn't there one of my quotes that something like ... mathematics is like mountain climbing, ... only a select few are able to see certain mountain glaciers after a great amount of effort. Imagine hanging around a music studio .... if you were deaf. You might see a bunch of self-important weirdos and have no idea of what they were creating. In the same way, many math people look like wierdo's. Often sloppy in their dress. Sometimes their desks are piled in papers. But they create. The look at chaos and bring order to it. They find new ways of thinking. They find new methods of solution. Using only their wits .... and often their intuition and instinct they discover. Every paper in pure mathematics must be original - adding something new to human knowledge. (This is quite different in the sciences - where they publish dozens of times as many papers per researcher - to conduct an experiment even if the result is not clear, to verify another researcher's data or refute, etc. Science articles and math articles are as different as night and day!) And, exactly like music, it becomes very addicting. They will spend all their free time fixated on a problem. Sometimes working for years without results - trying different lines of attack. And at the end - there are no gold records, no cheering crowds, ... , only a small group even understand what you've done. For example, Wiles at Princeton, who solved Fermat's theorem after 300 years in 1994...I heard that, at the time, less than 50 people in the world could understand the details of his work. But I'm sure he got a high from it. His name will go down in history.
Message
Re: Re: [L-OT] music and maths
2001-11-10 by GAmoore@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.