Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: Re: [L-OT] music and maths

2001-11-11 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra

Thoughts from the mind of GAmoore@..., 10-11-2001:

>  >>Surely the FRUITS of their labours might be beautiful, but how can
>>>maths be abstact.
>
>Did I say that? I didn't say that. Someone else did.

Did I say you said that?  I don't think so.

>  >>sure music can be described in purely mathematical terms,
>>
>>No, it can't.  The essence of music is it's... "quality"...
>
>In can be described in simple numeric terms - pitch, duration, tempo,
>volume. That is what the other writer was implying,

I know.  I just claimed that a numerical description of music is, in 
essence,not a description at all.  Whether you call such a 
description maths or not is of no consequence to me, since such 
descriptions are pointless to begin with.


tata,
HJ
-- 
     Hendrik Jan Veenstra
     email: mailto:h@...
     www:   http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.html

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.