Thoughts from the mind of GAmoore@..., 10-11-2001:
> >>Surely the FRUITS of their labours might be beautiful, but how can
>>>maths be abstact.
>
>Did I say that? I didn't say that. Someone else did.
Did I say you said that? I don't think so.
> >>sure music can be described in purely mathematical terms,
>>
>>No, it can't. The essence of music is it's... "quality"...
>
>In can be described in simple numeric terms - pitch, duration, tempo,
>volume. That is what the other writer was implying,
I know. I just claimed that a numerical description of music is, in
essence,not a description at all. Whether you call such a
description maths or not is of no consequence to me, since such
descriptions are pointless to begin with.
tata,
HJ
--
Hendrik Jan Veenstra
email: mailto:h@...
www: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.htmlMessage
Re: Re: [L-OT] music and maths
2001-11-11 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.