The Logic Off Topic list

Joeri,

>>I ordered Logic 5, but when there\ufffds the (to me) major long-known bug still
>>alive (tempochange/waveform bug), I\ufffdll definitely consider sending it
back.
>>
>Uh oh....

Well, I mostly do audio in Logic, mostly rock-pop productions.
There are quite a few bands that don\ufffdt want to play to click (and to me
that\ufffds ok, it\ufffds Rock \ufffdn\ufffd Roll...).
For editing I do tempo maps, but after that editing is almost impossible
because of this bug.

BTW: As Logic 5\ufffds automation claims to be sample accurate, is sample
accurate editing on the arrange page possible, too? It should be IMO...

Peter
---
http://www.merlinsound.de


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joeri Vankeirsbilck" <joeri@...>
To: <logic-ot@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] To upgrade or not to... (was: something about Ohmforce
not working in 481)


>
>
>Your points are very valid, especially to me (as you might have read
>regarding my upgrading "problems").
>
I'll check with Emagic.

>emagic told us about a "total rewrite" from Logic 3 to Logic 4, but many
>bugs were taken over.
>I hope this is not the case with 4 -> 5 (but I\ufffdm not holding my breath,
>because at least one bug - cycle - reportedly made it into 5...).
>
Some old bugs are still in there... some others have been fixed.