redirected from LUG to Logic-OT:
From: Lennart =?iso-8859-1?Q?W=E5hlin?= <tca@...>
Date: Thu Feb 14, 2002 3:25pm
Subject: Re: [GEN] 24 bits vs. 96K
Message: 22
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:09:42 -0700
From: Jonathan Christensen <jon@s...>
Subject: Re: [GEN] 24 bits vs. 96K
>Bit Rate determines dynamic range. You will definitely hear mor of
the soft
>sounds, and really loud sounds without compression when you use 24 bits
>instead of 16. It is certainly a much more audible difference.
Jonathan Christensen answered:
>I disagree with this. Bit depth has nothing to do with dynamic range. Bit
>depth has to do with resolution. A 16 bit converter and 24 bit converter
>will clip at exactly the same point (provided they are accurately
>calibrated). The difference is the quality of the quiter bits, providing
>a more accurate depiction of the instrument being recorded.
Eh...?
You just described the higher dynamics of 24bit....that you disagreed upon.
16 bit gives a theoretical dynamic range of 96dB, 24bit gives a
theoretical dynamic range of
144dB. A bit depth of 100000bit will will clip at exactly the same
level as anything else.
>(provided they are accurately calibrated)
Dynamic range has nothing to do with how strong you can play.
It is how quite you can play without distortion.
Best
Lennart
--
TAKING CARE of AUDIO(tm)
tca@t...Message
24bit
2002-02-15 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.