[Redirected from LUG to L-OT:] From: "jamie+howarth" <jamie@...> Date: Thu Apr 4, 2002 8:27am Subject: !!Thread getting too OT I think(OM)!!Re: [LAM] firewire drive Quoting Salient Bits > > SDII files can be read on a PC by Awave Studio and Quicktime also II data fork. > > So, it cannot read the other part of the SDII file - which is the > Resource Fork (which has channel and bit depth info etc.) - the reason ... PC's don't have an equivalent - > btw, this is one reason why in the past mac files didn't need extensions > like .exe as the necessary info was in the resource fork. With Mac OS X, > extensions are being used much more however than the resource fork > stuff - though it is still in use. This is one of the substantive differences ( as contrasted to the religious wars) that differentiates the two platforms. Apple saw this coming years and years ago, and imbedded an identifying creator code and filetype within the file's header, which makes files self-identifying to their host apps, and obviates the need for the clumsy .jpg or.qtv or.doc or .whatevah extensions. It is also a really really good idea, and part of why Mac users get so crazy over the platform wars is that most of the really really good ideas that the Mac OS clearly provided are undermined by the economic necessity to adopt less sophisticated (dumber) conventions still required by the Windows OS's stubborn reliance on vestiges of the antiquated MSDOS. It is truly paradoxical that a culture that kids itself that it is progressive still allows the droppings of this dinosaur to litter the landscape, 20 years after it was rendered technologically obsolete by the alternative methods of building apps the MacOs provided.
Message
Re: SDII, resource fork
2002-04-05 by Martin, Jeremy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.