>Just as other songwriters had once been affected by having their songs >swiped, the impact on Carey of losing the "Firecracker" sample for Glitter >was deep. The singer was forced to quickly change the sample on "Loverboy" >from "Firecracker" to Cameo's old hit, "Candy." > >"We had to work fast," says a Glitter source, "because we had to find music >that would fit what was already filmed." Nevertheless, the damage was done. >When "Loverboy" was released it was savaged by music industry trade paper >Billboard in an unusually harsh review. What I find depressing about this is: Everything. "We had to work fast, says a Glitter source"... and do what? Find another sample? Is that working fast? I thought working fast would mean working fast to create something. Why do they have to "work fast" to find something to cannibalize? Why couldn't they just make a groove? Is this really what it has come to at the top end of the biz where people are signing $80,000,000.00 deals? There was a time when people actually wrote music and using the music someone else wrote was considered plagiarism. Now who gets dibs on a sample of which hit song is a media sensation? "Pathetic" is the word that leaps into *my* mind.
Message
Re: [L-OT] (redirected) So big music guns DO steal music all the time!!
2002-04-25 by Dennis Gunn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.