Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [L-OT] (redirected) So big music guns DO steal music all the time!!

2002-04-25 by Dennis Gunn

>Just as other songwriters had once been affected by having their songs
>swiped, the impact on Carey of losing the "Firecracker" sample for Glitter
>was deep. The singer was forced to quickly change the sample on "Loverboy"
>from "Firecracker" to Cameo's old hit, "Candy."
>
>"We had to work fast," says a Glitter source, "because we had to find music
>that would fit what was already filmed." Nevertheless, the damage was done.
>When "Loverboy" was released it was savaged by music industry trade paper
>Billboard in an unusually harsh review.

What I find depressing about this is:

Everything.



  "We had to work fast, says a Glitter source"...  and do what? Find 
another sample?  Is that working fast?  I thought working fast would 
mean working fast to create something.  Why do they have to "work 
fast" to find something to cannibalize?  Why couldn't they just make 
a groove?  Is this really what it has come to at the top end of the 
biz where people are signing $80,000,000.00 deals?


There was a time when people actually wrote music and using the music 
someone else wrote was considered plagiarism.

Now who gets dibs on a sample of which hit song is a media sensation?


"Pathetic" is the word that leaps into *my* mind.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.