> Since it's all in one big file anyway and not something like two > separate files, the answer must be yes: some of the bytes of the file > are what the mac calls resource-fork, and others are data-fork. You > just won't be able to access the resource fork in any meaningful way > I suppose. The PC will just see it as one big file which has no > particular meaning to it. There won't be a way for the PC to > distinguish between resource-fork bytes and data-fork bytes. Hmm thats the first problem, preserving the resource fork, or at least recognising it as such.... > Is there a particular reason you ask this? JUst thinking about useful utilities and the like Hendrik (dont know who put that idea in my head ...) and I thought all the talk of SDII files and the like. It would be nice to write a little util (probably in perl, maybe in c++ but I have a lot to learn there...) to strip out the resource fork and save it in a useful format for PC users, like a MIDI file or something, maybe you and I could petition Emagic to tell us the format of their song files....?? Despite that, I am currently working 12+hours every day so I dont think I'll have much time to implement this, just nice to get the idea composted in to let it ferment a bit... Is there a spec/white paper/whatever on SDII anywhere on the web that I could look at (for some bedtime reading you understand ;) ) - I'm about to look anyway but it always helps to have a few pointers from all you folks -- Mark Lennox Technical Consultant ENDUSER Suite 40 Guinness Enterprise Centre Taylors Lane Dublin 8 Ireland Tel: +353 1 4100 665 Fax: +353 1 4100 985 web: http://www.enduser.com --
Message
Re: [L-OT] Mac question
2002-06-18 by Mark Lennox
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.