>Hi, > >I'd like to ask everyone's personal opinion. I'm not going to start this >discussion on the LUG or we'll g et into trouble. :-) > >Should I moderate harder on the LUG? Problem is that before I can put >someone into moderated mode, he has posted already. >E.g.: should I moderate every time the PDF, crack and dongle threads pop >up? I'm willing to do so, but I don't know whether the list wants me to. >Let's hear some opinions on it. I'd say yes. Here's what I'd suggest - if a topic that's OT or particularly beaten to death, send an ADMIN email to the list telling people to move on and warning them that you'll take action if they don't. If people post on that topic after that, take away their posting privelages for a length of time (probably just a couple days at first). If people continually keep posting OT material, keep blocking them (for longer periods of time) and if necessary, finally boot them off the list. Hopefully this would get people much more on topic (this is the policy on DAW-MAC, which seems to work very well). Also, when people are booted, don't kick them off the L-OT list, this way they can keep OT discussions going, just in the appropriate place. Just my opinion - right now the list is flooded with many useless posts and the list is barely worth reading. Mike _________ Mike Connelly, Composer/Sound Designer mpc@... / http://www.noisefloor.com
Message
Re: [L-OT] Moderation on the LUG
2000-12-18 by Mike Connelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.