Thoughts from the mind of Hector, 06-07-2002: > > I think of DJ's as arrangers - and they are brilliant at it. The problem >is >> that most of techno/hard trance/ blah blah blah... is that its ALL >> ARRANGEMENT and NO SONG. And whats with all these genre names? house, trip >> hop, blah blah -.... its all just instrumental dance music with minor >> variation in bpm. > >You are clearly missing the point of trance music. I'd already expected Tazmanian's post to cause some response :-))) >It has a very specific >audience - crowds people who dance in front of massive sound systems >under the influence of MDMA or occassionaly LSD. Producers and dj's will >not admit that on the record, as they influence young people and would not >want to be accused of condoning drug taking. But it *is* what trance is all >about and millions of people dance to it every weekend, worldwide, as a >choice of lifestyle. Glad someone is wise enough to admit this. > >OK, I'm showing my age. But >> clearly there have never been any "hit singles" from any of these artists, >> becasue they don't produce songs. > >I don't know about age, but you are definitely showing your ignorance. What >you say is simply not true, there have been plenty of trance hit singles >including several no.1's in the UK at least. I think what he maybe meant is that there have never been and probably never will be hit singles that will over time become more than one-day flies -- like Bowie's Space Oddity (to pull the msg back on the original topic :), or Zeppelin's Stairway To Heaven, or a zillion other hits that have lost very little of their original impact or quality or "brilliance". >I hope this has increased your understanding of why trance _is_ the way it >is. Good posting imo. Thanks. -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.html
Message
Re: [L-OT] David Bowie and David Torn
2002-07-06 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.