sorry hector, i don't remember it being stated that the live acts had to be 'underground' artists? i thought we were talking about live dance acts in general... i didn't think we were sub-dividing dance artists into financial genres as well? [for the record when underworld started they would take white labels of their tracks to record shops in the back of a car... that's pretty 'underground' isn't it? ;) they played live around this time too...] but 'what constitutes live dance music' is a hazy area isn't it? there is no 100% live in the conventional sense of the word with dance music... (unless you have ten people playing instruments) but i would classify the mixing desk/fx/riding the faders/improvising on the arrangement as 'the instruments' with this sort of music. anyone who has tried to arrange a track on-the-fly in this way (rather than automating it all on the sequencer) will know how much practice it takes... no, i don't think pob were 'as live' as this... but they had two personnel on stage, who were both 'doing something live' the whole time (whether it was tweaking/percussion/synth lines or whatever). how much can two people do? (the image of those old one-man-band guys with bass drums on their backs springs to mind here, it just wouldn't look right on stage would it? ;) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [L-OT] 'big fish' live techno acts
2002-07-07 by alan platten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.