Dennis Gunn wrote: >>I guess a lot of this depends on when Yamaha's Windows mLAN driver >>appears, on what features 5.3 has, and on how well 5.3 utilises the >>mLAN remote configuration features (if it does). >>If 5.3 implements some sort of remote control and autofarm features, >>but doesn't do them particularly well, I suppose they could get away >>with a further minor release to tidy things up a few months later, >>call it 5.3.1, and by calling it a maintenance release for features >>added on 5.3.0, they wouldn't be going against the position stated in >>the July 1st press release. >> >> >>Maybe all of this will take shape in the next ~four weeks, or maybe >>none of it will. > >It won't. But I will tell you I want to see network processing >happen very much too BUT there are other tricks in the book that are >not being exploited and there may be some nice surprises from another >direction soon. Yeah -- I saw a post from a guy claiming some inside knowledge on KVR -- he was saying that another big player is poised to enter the sequencing market. I was wondering who -- Native Instruments crossed my mind as a possibility but with the relaunch of Opcode hardware in recent days I thought it might even be Opcode returning from the dead. Stranger things ... Regards, Murray
Message
Re: [L-OT] nice future!
2002-07-29 by Murray McDowall
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.