The Logic Off Topic list

Tobias wrote:
>At 0:56 Uhr +0200 22.10.2002, The Pupkid wrote:
>>I must add my name to the list of people dismayed by the decision to
>>moderate the OT list and censor political discussion - as long as posts are
>>not aggressive / abusive then we should be able to talk about absolutely
>>anything - that's the whole point of an OT list.

>I agree to the above statement. But it talks about a OT list. What we have
>ist L-OT, and this is different. All this talk about moderation, politics
>and so on ignores the fact that we simply needed a L-OT list for
>help/discussion with logic related topics like audio, computers, music etc.
>that have nothing to do *directly* with logic.
>
>A lot of us didn´t want a T-OT (totally ...) list as a replacement for our
>local pub.
>So again my suggestion: Make this (T-)OT list for that purpose (of course
>unmoderated) and keep L-OT what it should be - a tool for people that are
>working with logic, doing audio, creating scores, worrying about damaged
>HDs or discussing the mastering process.

Hi Tobias,

I get the digest for the LUG but for L-OT I get the individual messages.
If I am not interested in an OT post or thread, I don't read it.  This
causes me no pain whatsoever. 

Why do you need to have moderators excluding messages on topics that aren't
relevant to you but which may interest others? What not simply ignore those
messages?

Regards,
Murray