>I agree with the first one, but if they don't care, or don't even >read the list and thus don't count, why not let the majority of >active list members who do care decide? Exactly. Here in the UK. If you don't vote then bad luck. If labour are voted out because all the labour voters didn't vote for whatever reason, the govt cant say 'well all the people that didn't vote were labour voters therefore we won' now do they. Anyway, all this is starting to get very, very boring. I am unsubbing for a while. The last music related post was a bloody long time ago. I'd give you an actual date if I could but too many political posts, too many list admin posts make it impossible to tell. I know I could set up filters but as people keep changing the heading, and I already have about 40 rules running it really isnt worth it. FWIW I voted to moderate the list not because I want to infringe on anyones right to freedom of speech, but because I'd rather have people talk politics on a political list. I don't expect people to start talking logic mixing techniques on a political list. But that is just me. I know people have their objections to this- but if you were in a restaurant discussing logic with a large group of people and two or three started talking over everyone else about politics would it not annoy you a bit? It did me. So I'm going to go to another restaurant. Yay for the stupid analogy. Bye for a while. James Richmond
Message
RE: [L-OT] Re: a final poll to decide this list's policy
2002-10-25 by Richmond, James (James) ** CTR **
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.