The Logic Off Topic list

> >Oh - I am very pleased about the present state of LUG - since it\ufffds
> >following strict rules, it\ufffds useful again. Thanks to the guys who do all
> >the work.
>
> Thats why this list should be unmoderated - as a counter balance to the
> strict censorship on the main list. This allows for a pressure valve for
> people to talk freely. Not interested in banter? Then stick to the main
LUG
> list.

Wrong. Most topics on the L-OT are not banter and are of interest to
musicians.  Somebody who likes the Logic only topic restrictions of the LUG
could also expect and enjoy music related topic restrictions on the L-OT.
If that person is not interested in banter then they would have no reason to
subscribe to a L-WOT list, if one existed.

Some people want it,  it is no skin off the backs of those that do not want
it.   Does it really matter to them that the subject line shows [L-WOT]
instead of [L-OT] on ocassional threads? It makes no difference to them,
their only argument is that it is not necessary, people can use their delete
buttons.   However, if this does not bother people, why is this thread
happening at all?

Those against a L-WOT list are simply trying to deny others their choice,
when it makes no real difference to them whether there is one or not.

Hector.