Thoughts from the mind of Jeremy Martin, 26-10-2002: > > And then you go about saying that people who like arguing >> have some sort of psychological disease. I don't think >> I quite like that to be honest. > >I was just joking, but still, some people don't seem to be able to >give this a rest and just wait for the poll to conclude. Maybe some people have given arguments as to why a poll is bound to be inconclusive or why the validity of the outcome might still be debatable. On the one hand you say this group is not a democracy but an oligarchy. Yet you use a democratic mechanism to determine list-policy. And at the same time this same democratic mechanism is bound to fail, for reasons explained earlier. Puzzling. And thus sparking more debate. Oh well... > > And then I'm even ignoring the fact that you seem to be >> as keen on an argument as the next guy... > >Honestly I don't care that much what you guys talk about here. If >members hadn't started writing/complaining to the admins about things >we would not have done anything. When people start bringing issues to >my attention that make perfect sense to me (e.g. keeping this Emagic- >related list focused loosely on music-related things only, but >nothing that will always eventually start big flame wars such as >politics) what can I do but reply to the constant barrage of >argumentative posts people have been writing? You could ignore them and simply refer everyone to the to-be outcome of the poll for example. But, as I said, you like a good debate as much as the next guy. I don't mind (to the contrary) -- but then don't go about offending "us argumentative types" as suffering from a disease, since you're not that different. Not at all. >If no one were to argue about this issue anymore I'd gladly wait for >the poll to conclude in silence.. I'll shut up. Fed up with all of this, and got better things to do than defend some right I think people have against moderators who think they know better, based on the opinion of a handful of complainers. I think it was Alexis who made a good point when he referred to some extremely boring discussions on the LUG: VST vs AU, etc, or the Mac vs PC debates being routed to the L-OT. Is any of those really on topic? A zillion VST/AU messages with extremely little informational contents? Or a PC/Mac debate -- is that L-OT stuff? Apparently it is, according to the powers in charge. No problem with that: as Dennis said, that's what you got a delete-key for. The problem is: where do you draw the border? At some arbitrary point, apparently. Because someone decides something is offensive. Or because someone decides something is not appropriate. Or because 3 or 4 members complain to the moderators. Or whatever. And it's this arbitrariness (?) that I protest against. -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.html
Message
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.