--- In logic-ot@y..., Alexis Aiosa <wirehead1@a...> wrote: > Tony Perretta wrote: > Henrik, is again a great example. > Peace, > Alexis Hey AA, are you secretly in love with Henrik? hahahaha I really think the admins should have just taken the ball in their able hands and made a DAW-OT list for the complainers and thus avoided all this debate over moderation. They didn't do that, so were stuck here voting on a one sided poll. If they want to be democratic about it and have a poll, at least they should include an option for keeping the OT-list how it is and moving the complainers. That way it would be a less one sided poll, seemingly favoring the complainers, who certainly also have a right to be accomodated. It makes more sense to me that way. Why have a list soley devoted to L-Politics when there are so many very off topic things being discussed here that the complainers are offended by? When the music theory, university choice or PC vs Mac wars come up, they can go where they have always gone without making a new list for EVERY topic not related to DAWs. Like I said: what's next a poll about a new L-OT-laundry detergent list? so do you guys and gals like Coke or Pepsi. teddybut
Message
Re: [L-OT] Why Jeremy Can Censor
2002-10-27 by plaarg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.