Zeek wrote: > I mentioned something to this effect in the last reply I made to > someone, and a request to at least take the BS to the OT list. The > traffic didn't change a bit and I KNOW I'm missing some things I'm > interested in by scanning through all the garbage quickly, since there > are so MANY digest every day as so MUCH off topic bullshit. I agree. <Joeri, no > offense but you're pretty quick to let us "old timers" know when we've > left out the proper acronym from the subject line, and I think we'd all > be better served by eliminating the bullshit and fuck what's in the > subject line as long as it relates to using Logic Audio. This is > getting WAY out of control. > > Regards, > ...z Don't take offense to this but I don't completely agree with this. I use Outlook for mails from this list. I like to have differnt folders for Gen, OT, etc. So I can then sift through the OT's when time is more permitting. So when things aren't labeled OT they go into another folder and I have to go through every e-mail. This isn't a problem for people who get the digest. But that has got to be an even bigger pain to have to scroll through a lot of huge OT with tons of qoutes and comments. If everybody was subscribed to the OT list atleast it could be sorted better or read at convenience. Or maybe not. As already mentioned most of the recent problems have been with kinda "on topic" discussions. So is there a solution? Will this thread become bigger than any of the problematic threads of recent? --Roger
Message
Re: [L-OT] I couldn't agree more...
2001-03-20 by litepipe
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.