or even if you do have all the vells and whistles. I try visiting the Imtermusic site [future music etc] and all i get is a blank page with a banner, on either NS or IE. Its just not mac-compatible it seems. Dave Eager SBS.TBleicher@... wrote: > Sascha Franck schrieb: > > Actually companies should offer some plain text site in addition, > install a > > counter and see which site will be visited more often. > > Hi Sascha, > > well, you even do not need a plain text site ;) to make loading fast > and > convenient. Mostly, when I do webdesign for my customers (Banking > companies, > communities etc.) it is necessary to view all(!) results with at least > three > or four different browsers and check all results. Furthermore, I do > not > use (currently) flash etc. because this is nice for the first time, > but > bothers people if it\ufffds still there after the 3rd time ;) > > > As far as Emagics site goes I'm sure that after your first > experience the > > "design" version will get no hits at all. > > Personally I like the design of the site, BUT: This site could be > easily made > without using any proprietary code etc. and it definitely would > function > the same on IE and Netscape. > > > Don't get me wrong, I love nice webdesign, but from companies such > as Emagic > > I want information and slick design, that's all. > > IMO there always should be a balance between a "nice-looking" and > "fast-loading" site, as well as the compliance to all necessary > browser > platforms. Personally I know a lot of sites that even won\ufffdt load if > you > have javascript disabled or no flash installed. Well, there are my > "one-visit-wonders" :) > > Bye > Thomas > >
Message
Re: [L-OT] Hot Damn, Emu's site beats Emagic's
2001-06-11 by David Eager
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.