On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:14 PM, I wrote: > I for one would not use anything larger than 250 GB for real time > audio. Guess I'd rather put a 750 GB one for system or backups, and > 250 GB ones for real time work... Just my $0.02. ...And here's why: On Sep 14, 2007, at 11:26 PM, Sascha Franck wrote regarding a test performed by a German magazine: > > their SATA comparison, two Seagate Barracudas with 250GB capacity > made it > to the first two places (I actually don't even know the differences > between > the two, the one ranking first has the model number ST3250410AS). > They seem > to be truly quiet as well. > Their IDE drives are ranking quite high, too. > > Fwiw, this test seemed to reveal that larger drives (anything > larger than > 250GB) wouldn't be that fast anymore, the transfer rate numbers are > really > going down for anything larger (the only real exception was again a > Seagate > Barracuda 750GB, but that one is IDE). > > Now, I am not sure how well all these tests relate to real world > useage, I > also don't know whether the results would be identical on Macs > (they tested > on PCs), but to me it seems that if you want truly fast drives, > SATA ones > with up to 250GB storage space are the way to go. > > Regards > Sascha
Message
Re: [L-OT] Internal drive to put in Mac Pro
2007-10-08 by Andy Hardwake
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.