Re: LAMP-CD Hidden Tracks
2001-08-02 by Dennis Gunn
jonathan@... writes:
> >Just goes to show that if you can confuse the US Patent
> >Office well enough they will grant you a patent for anything.
>
>I saw something on 60minutes about ridiculous patents (this
>one wasn't discussed). The whole patent thing was developed
>to protect actual inventions, not to protect the useage of any
>imaginable idea.
>
>For example, nobody has a patent on using ASCII, but attempts
>have been made to patent emoticons (smiley faces etc...). Wise
>heads at the patent office prevailed on this one and rejected this
>stupid claim.
>
>But the "hidden track" thing for CDs, while also being a ridiculous
>claim, somehow made it through?! Think about it: The RedBook
>standard as developed about 20years ago is made available to
>everybody license free. Anybody is free to make a CD that adheres
>to this standard, so that it plays in any CD player on the planet.
>The RedBook standard has a lot of little nitty gritty specs - and
>ones that clearly allow for this "hidden track" stuff, although they
>don't explicitly mention it.
While I worked in a patent law firm in the 80's I prosecuted and
successfully obtained a patent for an invention that consisted of no
more than a piled stone jetty completely encircling a body of water.
When I first looked at the original patent application I thought it
was the silliest thing I had ever seen.
The strange thing was it did have a legitimate useful function and
was a non obvious method of achieving it so it met the two criteria
needed. Can you guess what it did?
--
Dennis Gunn
Mightyjohn@...
check out MIGHTY JOHN HENRY's album "hot air head"
info at
http://www.twics.com/~mightyjo/home.html