Re: OS X.1 (redirected)
2002-05-01 by Martin, Jeremy
From: Howard Wooten <hwooten@...> Date: Fri Apr 26, 2002 0:40pm
Show quoted textHide quoted text
Subject: Re: [LAM] OS X.1 on 4/26/02 3:19 AM, Howard wrote: >> As mentioned earlier, someone has the mistaken idea that ASIO drivers are >> limited in this manner, they're not! >> >> "Release audio in background" works perfectly with ASIO drivers using >> Cubase. If EmagicLogic has a problem releasing drivers/files under ASIO, the >> problem rests squarely on their shoulders. Garth Hemphill <ghemphill@g...> >I think you misunderstand what Core Audio can do. Release in background >doesn't even touch the surface. Try running multiple apps simultaneously >using multiple ins and outs on your card, without releasing anything. Audio >continues to play regardless of being the active App, or being in the >background. Can't do that with ASIO. Hi Garth, I was addressing a single example (release audio) someone else had posted. The information was incorrect regarding what ASIO can or cannot do, that's all. Since I'm on PC I don't really know much about Core Audio, however... the lowly SBLive audio card can handle multiple streams of audio playback (up to 64 streams I think) using DirectX. Multiple applications can address the card at the same time, no problem. In some ways I think Core Audio is quite similar to DirectX. Core Audio drivers will be equivalent to the recent Microsoft low latency WDM driver standard. 12Tone's Sonar has adopted this standard. Like Core Audio, DirectX is part of the OS, not an add-on like ASIO. This is not an OS war, just clearing things up. Actually have to hand it to Steinberg... when no one else had low latency drivers they came up with ASIO. We tend to take it for granted, but look how much we owe to that standard... VSTinstruments, real time monitoring w/effects, efficient drivers...etc..etc. howard