The Logic Off Topic list

Sorry, I can't help ya there...I switched to Adobe InDesign...however, 
give me more time with InDesign, and we'll see just how good this puppy 
is.

But, with my experience, I would just boot up in OS9, then launch 
Quark.  Asking Quark to run under Classic, is like trying to edit audio 
using while using the app under classic.  Though it should work, and in 
some case does...things are more promising when using the application 
that it really was meant for...which at this point is OS9.

>> --- In logic-users@y..., Mark Lewno <lewnworx@a...> wrote:
>>> The key here is "Quark/Classic".
>>> I'd steer clear of classic if at all possible (especially with
>>> Quark, it's notoriously flaky under classic, not in and of itself,
>>> but what it does to classic).

Listen to this guy...Quark can be a bugger.

>> Not my experience - I've been using Quark 4.11 in Classic daily
>> since the 10.0 release, and it's been rather more stable than
>> Quark/OS9.

This is possible...since classic was perfected after this version had 
been around for while.  And yet Quark 5 is newer.

> really. quark 5 crashes in classic when i just drag a window corner to
> resize. super flaky. i'd try 4.11 but there ain't no going back once
> you've been in 5 for a while.

And this is REALLY possible, because Quark has tendency to not get 
right first time around...and always does this to its user 
before...Can't go back, once your file is saved as such.  But this 
person may not be aware that quark does provide Save As options that 
should allow you to save back one or two versions.  Might want to check 
that out.

> anyone else having issues with quark 5 in classic? if so, where is the
> depository for bug reports? macintouch?

No...

Just boot off OS9, then it shouldn't be so flakey...if that at all.

Peace,
Alexis

Is anyone using this preamp? If so would you care to comment on it?

Thanks, Bob Lowen
-- 
Bob Lowen
rlow@...