Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Thread

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

2002-10-26 by Colin Miller

At 10:40 PM 10/26/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>Go see this movie Bowling for Columbine by Michael Moore. It is
>a great documentary. I especially enjoyed the Charlton Heston
>interview and the Marilyn Manson interview. It has nothing to do
>with Logic or music, but it's really good.
>
>thanks
>Teddybut
>
>www.bowlingforcolumbine.com


I especially liked in the beginning with the bank that gives a free shotgun 
when you open an account.

Colin Miller

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

2002-10-27 by plaarg

--- In logic-ot@y..., Colin Miller <snoopy@m...> wrote:
> At 10:40 PM 10/26/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> >Go see this movie Bowling for Columbine by Michael Moore. It 
is
> >a great documentary. 
> I especially liked in the beginning with the bank that gives a 
free shotgun 
> when you open an account.
> 
> Colin Miller

Oh... Hi Colin

what did you think of the rest of the movie? Is Michael Moore an 
alarmist or is there really something messed up about our 
media?

teddybut

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

2002-10-27 by Colin Miller

>
>Oh... Hi Colin
>
>what did you think of the rest of the movie? Is Michael Moore an
>alarmist or is there really something messed up about our
>media?
>
>teddybut

I have seen the movie before your posts asking me to. I don't know why you 
would think I would think Micheal is an alarmist, I follow most everything 
he does and carry pretty much the same views always have. Heck, I have 
pointed that out time and time again, but still you never seem to get that. 
I get that a lot on this list. :-)

Colin

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

2002-10-27 by plaarg

> >what did you think of the rest of the movie? Is Michael Moore 
>>an alarmist or is there really something messed up about our
> >media?
> >teddybut
> 
--- In logic-ot@y..., Colin Miller <snoopy@m...> wrote:
> I have seen the movie before your posts asking me to. I don't 
>know why you would think I would think Micheal is an alarmist,

just a question, not loaded with sarcasm. I'm glad you don't think 
he's an alarmist, there's hope for me in your world.

> I follow most everything 
> he does and carry pretty much the same views always have. 

cool.

>Heck, I have  pointed that out time and time again, but still you 
>never seem to get that. I get that a lot on this list. :-)
> 
> Colin

ya, but then you intermix sarcasm with your posts about it and it's 
hard to decipher what you actually think. Maybe that's why you 
"get that a lot on this list". I get you now that you're not *trying* to 
be funny.. truce.

teddybut

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

2002-10-27 by Paul Wheeler&Kerry Higgs

Sorry , I didn't read this one closely other than to put it on the list of
things to catch up with some time .
Is it right that it is a documentary [?] and it starts with a bank that
gives out shotguns to new customers ...  oh come on ..surely not .
  Glad to hear they got the sniper ,that was frightening shit for you
Washington guys .
I'm thinking of getting into the 21st century and getting a dvd player . The
problem is the formats . Is DVD A going to be common ,as I understand it
only Warners are releasing in that format ,will it spread , and what about
super audio cd's . I dont want to end up with a sony beta like machine where
everything I want to see\hear is in another format . Wasn't region coding a
good idea !!!

                                                         Paul

Re: [L-OT] Bowling for Columbine

2002-10-28 by Colin Miller

At 07:58 PM 10/27/2002 +0000, you wrote:

>ya, but then you intermix sarcasm with your posts about it and it's
>hard to decipher what you actually think. Maybe that's why you
>"get that a lot on this list". I get you now that you're not *trying* to
>be funny.. truce.
>
>teddybut

True, my apologies. BTW a good source of news coverage:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/index.html

Colin

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.