FW: [LUG] logic as a remixing tool... argh
2004-03-20 by Paul Stephenson
Emagic, Please read the letter below. It pretty much describes how we all feel about Logic's Audio Capabilities for working seamlessly. Please believe me when I say that more than a few hundred people that need what this message describes. I still love logic, but I moved from PC to Mac, and I really loved Sound Forge for audio editing. After moving to the Mac I haven't found a program that allows me to work as fast as I could on PC, but the idea of having sample accurate cutting of audio in the arrange window and allowing us to move audio to any location we want, i.e. not limited to tick mark resolution, is awesome! Thanks for tools, Paul Stephenson
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message----- From: i_love_ubik [mailto:i_love_ubik@...] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 5:01 PM To: logic-users@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [LUG] logic as a remixing tool... argh > > > IMO, in going from PT to Logic you went from the strongest audio > > > editor to the weakest. > i don't get why people say this. the audio editing in logic is fine. > if by being different pro tools makes it weak then i guess. For me the partykiller is the lack of sample-accuracy in the arrange window. I want to zoom all the way in, make my cut precisely where the zero-cross is, grab the edge and drag the soundbite to some easily discernable predefined beat on the time ruler, flash to the other edge, cut it at the zero cross closest to the same time division, zoom out. In PT, or Cubase, or DP, I can do the above in about 5 seconds in the same window, and have a seamless, popless loop placed exactly where I need it. In Logic, it takes 5x longer and I have to keep switching out to the sample editor, and I'm never 100% confident I'm actually at the right beat division until I press play and hear it. So yes, I can do it in Logic, I can't argue that it's 'fine'. It's just that I cut my teeth on editors that are 'exemplary', and I miss them at times. Respectfully, u b i k _________________________________________________________________ / Logic Users Group - http://www.logic-users.org/ListPolicy.html / Subjects labels: no more [LAM], it is now considered default / ... include a label only when applicable: [GEN] [LAW] [LC] [OT] / Logic FAQ: http://logicfaq.omega-art.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links