> Is there a consensus on a good, modestly priced ($250-$500 range)
>
I would recommend the Studio Projects C3 (multi-pattern condenser), T3
(same, but tube), the MXL V6 (haven't used this one yet, but its
getting great reviews), or an AKG C414 (used for around $400-$500).
I typically go for the S.P. C3 very often. It has tonal characteristics
very similar to a U87(to me), but with slightly more pronounced highs.
It really makes vocals cut without any need for EQ. The C414 is a total
workhorse. The other two I listed will deliver very good results, but
with warmer tube properties.
Now that that's been said: I've been on the hunt myself for some more
mics to add to my collection and I've read more than my share of
forums. Through all of the arguing and opinion riddled speculation, the
only answer I could come to is that everyone's tastes are subjective.
It is easier to go on someone's opinion to buy a mic, but seldom are
you going to be satisfied. I've been through too many mics to go by
that anymore. My favorite mics that i own are the ones that I demo'ed
at music stores or borrowed from someone to see if i really like it.
All mics are DIFFERENT. They're not necessarily better or worse. Each
has its on character that will or won't appeal to different people.
Each mic does something that another mic won't do. I doubt I would ever
use a Reslo ribbon mic to cut vocals because of they're sound, but I
might use it for the character it adds as an effect.
Is the C3 as "good" as a U87? Who cares? The question is, when I record
something with either mic, "which one captures what i want to hear and
delivers the sound that pleases me, or pleases one of my clients?" Is a
Peluso mic like a U47? Who knows? Who cares? (try to find me 2 U47's
that sound the same)
The point is: don't go by recommendation. Don't go by reputation. Don't
go by name. Go by your ears. Go listen. Rent some. Borrow some. Buy
some and take them back. Just make sure you let your ears decide.
Ok, now I'm off my soap box.
Keith Giosa