On 13.01.2006, at 05:57, Nicolas diPierro wrote:
> Peter, what's your overall impression of the Saffire? I've been
> looking at it as a kind of Mbox for Logic... and picking one up (not
> until the dust from NAMM settles, of course).
Good device if you are happy as it is. You cannot have mono outputs
for monitoring, they are always paired and you can just balance them.
You need the control panel always open and visible, at least to
change between recording and playback.
There could be an issue with a "too hot" Firewire bus of the iMac G5,
suspected the dealer after he got several units returned (two of them
were mine). But that was just a guess while they investigated the
problem. I can't say what the real cause is but the phantom power
went down below 5 V which filled the headphones with perfect silence.
> It seems perfect: a good Logic citizen, 4 in, 10 out, 24bit/192kHz
> processing which nothing else at this price point seems to have.
> It's surround capable,
The sound quality is very good and the effects either. Foldback
reverb is a relief if you record vocals.
You are right, in terms of sound quality there is nothing comparable
in that class. It costs 475 Euro here, some special price. I didn't
even find another device in that price class, not to mention the
quality.
I returned mine and got a Fireface because of the stereo-only
monitoring of the Saffire, the phantom power failure and the
software. Of course I payed the triple price for the Fireface and a
comparison won't be fair.
> and the big gripes about the software interface
> look cleared up with v 2.0 of the saffire control.
There were big gripes? My God. One of the "small" gripes in the Mac
version 2.0 was still a showstopper for me.
Conclusion:
If you want one, get one and test it. If you are happy then it was a
very good deal. If not but you want that sound quality, be prepared
to spend much more money.
___
Peter Ostry