Lpc2000

Peter Homann wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I'm deciding between using GCC and purchasing the Rowley Crossworks 
>compiler.
>
>I have a question though. If the Rowley compiler is GCC based, what is 
>the advantage of it over the GCC one?
>
>  
>
They make it brain-dead simple to install & invoke the gcc compiler.

TomW



>Cheers,
>
>Peter.
>
>bell_c_d wrote:
>
>  
>
>>--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "yodathgreat" 
>><christophe.darnet@l...> wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>for choice a ARM Compiler Its' very simple.
>>>No professional use GCC.
>>>
>>>Only ADS 1.2 or 2.2, Or IAR compiler.(there are similar)
>>>
>>>The GCC it's only for student, home work or for Linux user.
>>>
>>>Best regards
>>>Yodathegreat
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Just one data point, but: I'm a professional developer (30 years s/w 
>>development experience from micros to mainframes).  Now working on 
>>third LPC-based commercial product.  Compared Keil, IAR, and gcc and 
>>chose Rowley Crossworks (gcc-based).
>>
>>A recent poll was done on this group that showed Keil and Rowley 
>>leading the pack for most-used compiler/IDE, so you might be 
>>surprised at how many professionals use gcc.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>


-- 
Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
http://openhardware.net, http://cyberiansoftware.com
"Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
----------------------------------------------------