Lpc2000

yodathgreat wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have make some bench, Speed and Size code.
>GCC vs ADS 1.2
>GCC vs ADS 2.2
>GCC vs IAR 4.30
>IAR 4.30 vs ADS 1.2
>IAR 4.30 vs ADS 2.2
>
>And the GCC lose allways....
>
>and for Rowley may be it's ok for you.
>But we uses a real JTAG. (JENNI, NOHAU, MAJIC MX , OPELLA, GENIA)
>And it's impossible on Rowley configuration, I have download
>the eval...
>
>35ko/sec with CrossConnect.it's funny.....My code size is 2Mo
>  
>
The download speed for the Philips part has improved in the next 
firmware release - we have optimised the RTCK implementation. Are you 
really planning to download 2Mb to an LPC2xxx board?

>The JTAG/Software of Rowley is a good configuration
>if you have a little code on little ARM...
>But if your code is big....Drink some Coffee....
>  
>
>And the problem with some little company (Rowley)
>is the support...I'm french and I want a french Support no
>a english support.
>  
>
Sounds like you have a firm criteria for product purchase - bon chance.

Regards
Michael

>best regards
>Yodathegreat
>
>-- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "bell_c_d" <bell_c_d@y...> wrote:
>  
>
>>--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "yodathgreat" 
>><christophe.darnet@l...> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>for choice a ARM Compiler Its' very simple.
>>>No professional use GCC.
>>>
>>>Only ADS 1.2 or 2.2, Or IAR compiler.(there are similar)
>>>
>>>The GCC it's only for student, home work or for Linux user.
>>>
>>>Best regards
>>>Yodathegreat
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Just one data point, but: I'm a professional developer (30 years s/w 
>>development experience from micros to mainframes).  Now working on 
>>third LPC-based commercial product.  Compared Keil, IAR, and gcc and 
>>chose Rowley Crossworks (gcc-based).
>>
>>A recent poll was done on this group that showed Keil and Rowley 
>>leading the pack for most-used compiler/IDE, so you might be 
>>surprised at how many professionals use gcc.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>  
>