Lpc2000

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:05:46 -0500
  Tom Walsh <tom@...> wrote:
> Alex_Rambler wrote:
> 
>>b> Just one data point, but: I'm a professional developer (30 years 
>>s/w
>>b> development experience from micros to mainframes).  Now working on 
>>b> third LPC-based commercial product.  Compared Keil, IAR, and gcc 
>>and 
>>b> chose Rowley Crossworks (gcc-based).
>>
>>Oh, I can't hold out from the reply.
>>I tried to use Crossworks in the begining to explore LPC2xxx.
>>It ugly work with the structures. I tried to define T0MCR like
>> struct:
>>{{
>>typedef struct
>>  { 
>>    __REG32 MR0I :1;
>>    __REG32 MR0R :1;
>>    __REG32 MR0S :1;
>>
>>    __REG32 MR1I :1;
>>    __REG32 MR1R :1;
>>    __REG32 MR1S :1;
>>    
>>    __REG32 MR2I :1;
>>    __REG32 MR2R :1;
>>    __REG32 MR2S :1;
>>    
>>    __REG32 MR3I :1;
>>    __REG32 MR3R :1;
>>    __REG32 MR3S :1;    
>>    __REG32      :4;    
>>} __txmcr_bits;
>>
>>#define T0MCRbits (*(volatile __txmcr_bits *)0xE0004014)
>>
>>}}
>>
>>  
>>
> The only thing I am curious about is why you bounded your struct def 
> inside a double code block?
> 
> TomW
> 
It's only for code separation in this mail :-)